Tribute to Indian Hockey Team in Olympics!

Indian Hockey Team The best Ever Hockey Champions of Olympics. Hockey was Introduced into Olympics in 1908 at First Time. But at that time There is no Team India in Olympics. After 20 Years Olympics Indian Hockey Team Introduced to World in the Olympics year of 2028. It is the first Olympics to India, but un beatablely India Turned as Champions of Hockey Olympics 1928. From there Their Victorious Glow Continued as a Defending Champions with no Breaks until the year 1980.

They are Defending Champions Continuously for 11 Olympic Champions in Hockey and won 11 medals in 12 Olympics Games. Never beaten un Breakable record has owned by Indian Hockey in the History. After 1980's their Victorious glow comes to and end. from there never never Qulayfied into the Olympic finals after 1980. Last 8 years Even the team has struggling to qualify for Olympics. The Glory of victory has lost by Indian Hockey. Now it's time to get Bring back that Charisma in Olympics. After 8 Years Indian Hockey Team has been Qualified for London Olympics2012.

India Has need to Sparkle the Victorious Glory in Olympics Once Again. So Every body Let's Support to the the Indian Hockey Team for bring back again the Glory and Kick off the fate. Tribute to Indian Hockey Olympic Champions and Best wishes to Indian Hockey Team Olympic2012.

Supported by:

Play Rummy - Ace2Three
http://www.ace2three.com/

Download Rummy
http://www.ace2three.com/downloads_win.html

Read more »

Google Penalising for Paid Link Building!

Google Panda is modified to Which Way to the Google search results in a ranking algorithm. The main aim of Google is to rank the Panda Which sites are less in quality. It Also Helps searching in the top order with high quality sites. It Also Reported That social networking sites are dropped down in ranking to two more advertisement. The Panda update has-been really a sequence of twists and renews added on with the method. While it has many vacant junk mail sites from the search engine positions, the disadvantage is many websites and genuine dealings Were Resettlement away with them.

Fortunately, Googlehas Affirmed precisely What They are looking so sites can consequently prepared and restore. This is absolutely Believed in the prospect of SEO and When Particularly preferred places to associate advertising. The updates or targeted sites are badly written and with the outdated copy. This eans Their sites are overused Usually to writing articles for quick and filled with keywords originate Themselves by the under side of the search pile. If the search engine styles are under Explained persist it can really concern us for the small dealer along with That is dipping into the shark hunt. Keep close eye on your Google webmaster tool.

There are several ways of building back links out of which link exchange is common among webmasters and seo expert. There are basically two types of link exchange i.e. two way link exchange and three way link exchange. I know you all guys are very well aware of one way and two way link exchange.

Before you start thinking to start link exchange for your or client website it is necessary to aware about disadvantages of link exchange.
Here are few top demerit / disadvantages of link exchange:

1) It's time consuming work
2) Your link can be removed any time without giving any notification and you will never know until you are going to cross check.
3) Even though you found that your link is no more available on other website, you will again have to contact to the webmaster to put it back which is really time consuming and double work.
4) If other webmaster not reply to your mail then ultimately you will have to option other than to remove their back link from your website, which is again going to consume your time, after all time is money.
5) Many times few bad webmasters block search engines to crawl those pages from where you are about to get back links. They do it through Robots.txt file or just keep rel = "nofollow" on your page link.

So think twice before you are going to put your hard work and time before you start link exchange. However doing link exchange through your friend's or relative's website is fine, at least you are sure that your link is going to live there as far the website is live.
Google Trying to penalizes Paid links:

Google is now Actively Encouraging webmasters to report 'Paid Links' so it can test a new hand of STI algorithm to Give less weight to links Paid thesis. This Can Be Done from the Google webmaster's console via a spam report form.
So what are Paid Links?

Rather Or What Does Google think of a bad link Paid? The answer According To Google is: Bad links are "paid links and PageRank flow That Attempt to game Google's rankings."

Often This is Obvious, When some ads for products or services Appears in small text boxes around the page and Have little relevance to the main page content.

Purpose what about 'sponsored listings' or 'sponsored ads' or 'banner advertising'. This is Where the distinction Becomes harder, Both for real people to tell, aussi order for robots to tell.

Some think eXtraSearch That 'Legitimate' forms of web advertising - Such as banner ads with links Could Be adversely hit in the near future by revised search engine algorithms to deal with Which Attempt Paid link the problem.

When considering a search engine marketing strategy, Business Referrals Likely to Anticipate Changes in search engines to keep ahead of Competitors. eXtraSearch Provide a consultancy service to Search engine business as well as full Providing search engine optimization services.

Google Chrome also penalised for Sponsor links if you search the word browser, Chrome No Longer appears on page 1 and Is Now 61 position. they has Google Said That Will penalizes this page by Reducing it's PageRank Which Will Reduce Ability to rank for terms Such as browser. Also added Google That this punishment Will last for at least 60 days.

Read more »

Long-Tail Keywords Increase Search Rankings By SEO On Page Optimization

On-page optimization for long-tail keywords can result in ranking more than a page higher in search results, compared to half a page optimizing with head terms, according to a study by New York-based SEO & SaaS company Conductor. They also found that long-tail keywords converted 2.5 times better than head terms.

You may remember the uproar from last fall, when SEOMoz purported there was a higher correlation between LDA scores and high rankings than any other factor. Some took this to mean that on-page optimization didn’t matter. It’s a topic that still pops up now and again; my on-page optimization isn’t working, I don’t know if it’s worth it... on-page optimization must be dead.

Not so, says Conductor. In their research study The Long Tail of Search, Conductor examined the effects of on-page auditing and optimization for long-tail keywords, versus optimizing for head terms or failing to optimize on-page at all. Not surprisingly, they saw a downward movement of more than two positions for keywords with no on-page optimization.

“Even in 2011 – often at executive prodding – many marketers are still singularly focused on the most searched terms in their industry that are also the most competitive and difficult to move up the search rankings," Conductor CEO Seth Besmertnik told Search Engine Watch. "As our study shows, we think there is huge opportunity in the long tail of search for the savvy search marketer to move up the search rankings more rapidly and convert at a rate that is 2.5 times greater than for head terms.”

Conductor’s research involved thousands of keywords studied over a period of nine months, using the data collection and on-page recommendations of their SEO platform, Searchlight. They first segmented keywords into three groups:

1. Keywords with shrinking on-page issues (being resolved by SEO).
2. Keywords with growing on-page issues (not being resolved by SEO).
3. Keywords with no on-page issues.


On-Page Optimization Crucial for SEO:

Optimizing on-page elements for the keywords marketers want to rank for is critical, according to Conductor's research. On-page optimization for keywords identified by Searchlight as having on-page issues consistently resulted in rankings increases, by an average of 11.24 positions.

Websites with identified issues but no on-page optimization saw a two position drop. Keywords with no identified issues saw a less than one position increase.
Long-Tail Keywords Show Greatest Rankings Increases. Recognizing that there are two ways marketers commonly use the word “long-tail,” they looked at query volumes and the number of keywords in a phrase as separate issues and tested twice.

First, they excluded medium-volume keywords for the purpose of this study, focusing on those with either high (head) or low (long-tail) query volumes. In this breakdown, they found that long-tail terms were “significantly” more impacted by on-page optimization, with an 11 position increase, compared to six positions for higher volume, head keywords. For the second part, they separated keywords according to the number of words in the term; head keywords were one to two word queries, while long-tail terms had three or more words. Again, they found that on-page optimization increased long-term rankings more, but by a smaller margin. With this segmentation, long-tail terms rose an average of six positions and head terms an average of four.
Long-Tail Terms Convert 2.5 Times More

The final part of their study looked at conversion rates, examining more than 7 million visits to three major retailers. Long-tail terms – those with three words or more – converted two and a half times more than head terms. Conductor said this is a great opportunity for marketers who may be disproportionately focusing on higher volume, one- to two-word search terms. On-page optimization is one of many strategies SEOs and marketers can use to increase rankings and conversions. It’s also just good practice to make sure your page addresses the issues that brought visitors to the site in the first place.

Contribution: Miranda Miller

Read more »

Google Panda Updates for SEO Review 2011

Although the online Search Engine Giant on the internet look for big makes a amazing 500 changes to the inner details of their software every period, there is certainly not an SEO company on the earth that has not been hit by Google’s latest Algorithm Updates on the internet bet on key elements changes. It is these complicated specifications of complete that management who comes out on top when it comes to SEO work, Many of the changes will takes place in the scores and Income Top status and Chartered Online Search Engine sites comes immediately and some of the new internet sites are head on SERP's.

Initially the Panda update was called the farmer update by the search engine marketing industry because it seemed to be targeting content farms and low quality sites that were spamming the search results. It was originally launched in February 2011 and was credited with affecting up to 12% of all search results pages. The purpose behind Google Panda was to identify low quality content vs. high quality content and was named after one of Google’s lead engineers.

The impact of the latest change (named ‘Panda 2.5’ by industry leaders) has had on the SEO industry that SEO (search engine optimization) has been one of the most important buzz words for web publishers over the past 10 years. Getting ranked in Google means free traffic for web publishers, so improving and optimizing a given website for the search engines was essential. However, Google Panda is here to stay, and it has forever changed the rules of SEO.

Panda has exposed the shady SEO tactics of less-than-reputable SEO firms and favoured websites that offer unique content and trustworthy backlinks. Sites that have been identified as spam sites or content farms have been worst hit, while some of the world’s most prestigious PR websites have suffered a huge blow for reasons largely unknown. Though the many different components of SEO can be difficult for business owners to get their heads around, these Panda updates have proven one thing for sure – anyone looking to partner with an online marketing agency needs to choose a company that has their best interests at heart, not just the interests of their bank account. Failure to do so could end up damaging the reputation of the company's website".

Google bosses improve their search facilities by the day. In an interview conducted by stonetemple.com with Google's Director of Research Peter Norvig, the expert claims that 'Google tests tens of thousands of algorithm changes per year, and make one to two actual changes every day'.

As more and more users complained about search results, Google realized it needed to shift, and in came Google Panda. Google Panda is an entirely new way for Google to evaluate websites. And while Google will still factor in many of the same criteria it has in the past, Google Panda adds an entirely new element to Google's ranking methodology.

Read more »

Google beats Facebook with Google+ Ad

It was not that extensive ago that the strategy of flicking on a tv and seeing a business for anything Google-related seemed completely implausible. For many years, the business seemed to take a certain take great pride in in not having to resort to traditional marketing channels and advertising options, and it eschewed TV ads entirely for well over a decades of its lifetime. Then, in March 2010, the web large created its TV business debut: with a Extremely Serving Ad, no less (and a great one at that).

Since then it’s become a bit more frequent to see Search engines ads going on TV — the business has begun offering its Opera technique with ads, for example. And previously currently it ran what usually be its first TV location for its public networking, Google+.

The ad, which made an appearance during the Christmas Day Lions/Packers activity, stresses intensely on Google+’s Groups function and Hangouts, informing visitors that it’s “Sharing, but like actual life”.

The move is not very unexpected — Search engines has been putting a lot of muscle tissue behind driving a vehicle people toward Google+, such as offering an unmissable ad on Search engines.com when the service first started out to the public, and driving a vehicle people of the newest edition of Google android to make a Google+ if they have already.

Read more »

Google Going To Close Knol, Friend Connect, Wave, And More..

Since Google CEO Larry Page took the helm this past spring, one of the company’s most visible initiatives has been to trim and shut down its products that haven’t taken off. These have included Aardvark, Google Desktop, Fast Flip, Code Search, Buzz, Jaiku, and even Google Labs — and today, it’s announcing a new batch of products that will be shut down in the coming months.

Among the casualties (some of which had previously been announced): Google’s Wikipedia challenger, Google Knol, Google Friend Connect (which is being supplanted by Google+), and Google Wave — which Google ended development on a year ago and will soon close down entirely.

Knol, in particular, comes as something of a surprise to me — because I figured Google had already shut it down. The site first launched back in 2008 to much fanfare, as Google introduced a potential Wikipedia challenger that would allow article contributors to monetize their content (the idea being that if you wrote content worth reading, you could make some money off of it). But the product languished, and back in July 2010 some extended downtime made us wonder if Google had forgotten about it.

Google didn’t seem to allocate many resources to the project, and it certainly didn’t put much emphasis behind it from a press standpoint — I can’t remember the last time I was pitched on a new Knol feature or milestone. Knol will live on at Annotum.org, which is powered by WordPress and was built in collaboration with Solvitor and Crowd Favorite.

Here’s the full list of products being shuttered, from Google’s blog post:

* Google Bookmarks Lists—This is an experimental feature for sharing bookmarks and collaborating with friends, which we’re going to end on December 19, 2011. All bookmarks within Lists will be retained and labeled for easier identification, while the rest of Google Bookmarks will function as usual. As Lists was an English-only feature, non-English languages will be unaffected.

* Google Friend Connect—Friend Connect allows webmasters to add social features to their sites by embedding a few snippets of code. We’re retiring the service for all non-Blogger sites on March 1, 2012. We encourage affected sites to create a Google+ page and place a Google+ badge on their site so they can bring their community of followers to Google+ and use new features like Circles and Hangouts to keep in touch.

* Google Gears—In March we said goodbye to the Gears browser extension for creating offline web applications and stopped supporting new browsers. On December 1, 2011, Gears-based Gmail and Calendar offline will stop working across all browsers, and later in December Gears will no longer be available for download. This is part of our effort to help incorporate offline capabilities into HTML5, and we’ve made a lot of progress. For example, you can access Gmail, Calendar and Docs offline in Chrome.

* Google Search Timeline—We’re removing this graph of historical results for a query. Users will be able to restrict any search to particular time periods using the refinement tools on the left-hand side of the search page. Additionally, users who wish to see graphs with historical trends for a web search can use google.com/trends or google.com/insights/search/ for data since 2004. For more historical data, the “ngram viewer” in Google Books offers similar information.

* Google Wave—We announced that we’d stopped development on Google Wave over a year ago. But as of January 31, 2012, Wave will become read-only and you won’t be able to create new ones. On April 30 we will turn it off completely. You’ll be able to continue exporting individual waves using the existing PDF export feature until the Google Wave service is turned off. If you’d like to continue using this technology, there are a number of open-source projects, including Apache Wave and Walkaround.

* Knol—We launched Knol in 2007 to help improve web content by enabling experts to collaborate on in-depth articles. In order to continue this work, we’ve been working with Solvitor and Crowd Favorite to create Annotum, an open-source scholarly authoring and publishing platform based on WordPress. Knol will work as usual until April 30, 2012, and you can download your knols to a file and/or migrate them to WordPress.com. From May 1 through October 1, 2012, knols will no longer be viewable, but can be downloaded and exported. After that time, Knol content will no longer be accessible.

* Renewable Energy Cheaper than Coal

Source: Google Products

Read more »

Tired Facebookers.. Now It's Time to Try Facedrink!

Facedrink......A Social Drink!

“It gives you social energy. It gives you taste of friendship.” It’s Facedrink! And you better go buy some because it will be sued out of existence any minute now. Following in the footsteps of the unofficial Mark Zuckerberg action figure, some dude named Barry Moustapha (ROFLCOPTER) has created a lawyer-magnet energy drink. It’s themed with Facebook colors and proudly displays an “Add as Friend” button on the label. I’d be suspicious this was a hoax, but there’s a photo of a real bottle and reviewers confirm it leave a worse taste in your mouth than getting Poked by your dad.

The gloriously named Barry Moustapha trumpets “Facedrink achieves the goal that I set out for by providing you with the extra energy needed to be social or to deal with your boss.” Reviewers on Amazon seem to disagree, though:

“All my friends drank it up, and it starting to feel odd being the only person in line (besides my friend Tom) who was buying MyDrink anymore…Over time, I think I got too comfortable with it. I started drinking it with my parents, my boss, people I hadn’t seen since high school. Being too casual with FaceDrink eventually lead me to make some comments regarding my cousin possibly being gay, and my boss being a dick and since then I’ve cut back on who I drink it with. I should just quit it all together, but I might have a mild addiction at this point.”

Facedrink will make a great holiday gift, and an even better collectors item as there’s no way Moustapha’s getting away with this. Facebook successfully trademarked the word “face” specifically to prevent this kind of exploitation of its name. But I think there might be an amicable way to settle this. Facebook, acquire Facedrink, and promptly move their operations into the cafeteria of your swanky new Menlo Park headquarters.

After all, “Whether it is work, school, sports or just getting through the daily routine, Facedrink provides you with a boost of energy to manage it all.”

Price: 6 bottles Pack just $18, 1 Bottle $3... Available in 6 Pack Only.

Source: Facedrink......A Social Drink!

Read more »