Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts

Monday, July 23, 2012

Tribute to Indian Hockey Team in Olympics!


Indian Hockey Team The best Ever Hockey Champions of Olympics. Hockey was Introduced into Olympics in 1908 at First Time. But at that time There is no Team India in Olympics. After 20 Years Olympics Indian Hockey Team Introduced to World in the Olympics year of 2028. It is the first Olympics to India, but un beatablely India Turned as Champions of Hockey Olympics 1928. From there Their Victorious Glow Continued as a Defending Champions with no Breaks until the year 1980.

They are Defending Champions Continuously for 11 Olympic Champions in Hockey and won 11 medals in 12 Olympics Games. Never beaten un Breakable record has owned by Indian Hockey in the History. After 1980's their Victorious glow comes to and end. from there never never Qulayfied into the Olympic finals after 1980. Last 8 years Even the team has struggling to qualify for Olympics. The Glory of victory has lost by Indian Hockey. Now it's time to get Bring back that Charisma in Olympics. After 8 Years Indian Hockey Team has been Qualified for London Olympics2012.

India Has need to Sparkle the Victorious Glory in Olympics Once Again. So Every body Let's Support to the the Indian Hockey Team for bring back again the Glory and Kick off the fate. Tribute to Indian Hockey Olympic Champions and Best wishes to Indian Hockey Team Olympic2012.

Supported by:

Play Rummy - Ace2Three
http://www.ace2three.com/

Download Rummy
http://www.ace2three.com/downloads_win.html

Monday, June 4, 2012

Play Indian Skill Game Ace2Three Online Rummy And Refine Your Rummy Skills

Rummy is a classical game played by many people across the world. The origin of the game rummy is not clearly known but is actively played in most of the countries. Rummy doesn't have well defined rules and hence it is played differently in different countries with different names such as Classical Rummy, Rummy 500, Gin Rummy, Contract Rummy, Kalooki, Canasta, Oklahoma Rummy, etc.. People of all age groups love playing the game Rummy. It is easy to learn, easy to play and requires no physical effort. Logical thinking, concentration and guessing are mainly required in playing, enjoying and winning the game.

Rummy can be played to certain score such as up to 101 or 201 or can be played to fixed number of deals such as best of three or best of five and is usually played between 2 to 6 players.
Ace2three.com is an exquisite website that provides the game, Rummy, online among various competitors in the field. Playing Rummy on Ace2three.com will be the best experience to any person.

The Rummy tutorial gives the instructions and guidelines which guides the players who are new to the game and helps them to learn and enjoy the game.Ace2three.com provides, the Rummy players, two types of multi table tournaments known as JUMBO and ELITE. Some of the tournaments under ELITE are ELITE24; ELITE30; ELITE36; ELITE48 etc.

On Ace2three.com, one can Play Rummy with play chips which is free of cost or can also play with real chips which involves money. The three game types played on Ace2three.com are 101 pool, 201 pool and best of three which is further classified into 6 player games and 2 player games. The bet starts from 500 and may go up to 5000.

Ace2three.com even provides chat space to the players where the players have a chance to chat and enjoy the company of other members playing on the same table. This chat space is transparent and so visible to all the players playing on that particular table. Playing Card Games is a favorite entertainment for most of the Indians. Among these Card Games Online Rummy is the most popular game played by families. Relatives and friends sit together in their leisure time or during a vacation and play the game Rummy. Everyone from adolescents to adults participate in the game.

Rummy is a game which requires skill rather than luck because one has to remember the cards discarded by opponents and must arrange their cards accordingly to make the sets, whereas, gambling is based on pure luck. The Honorable Supreme Court of India, in the case of State Of Andhra Pradesh vs K. Satyanarayana & Ors on 22 November, 1967, said that "Rummy is not a game entirely of chance like the 'three-card' game. It requires certain amount of skill because the fall of the cards has to be memories and the building up of Indian Rummy requires considerable skill in holding and discarding cards. It is mainly and preponderantly a game of skill. The chance in Rummy is of the same character as the chance in a deal at a game of bridge. In fact in all games in which cards     are shuffled and dealt out, there is an element of chance, because the distribution of the cards is not according to any set pattern but is dependent upon how the cards find their place in the shuffled pack:"

Hence the Honorable Supreme Court of India made the skill games as perfectly legal in the year 1968 under the current law. Except, in Orissa and Assam, where the laws applicable to gambling do not provide a clear exemption to playing games of skill, playing Rummy is declared as legal. Visit: http://www.ace2three.com/

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Google Penalising for Paid Link Building!

Google Panda is modified to Which Way to the Google search results in a ranking algorithm. The main aim of Google is to rank the Panda Which sites are less in quality. It Also Helps searching in the top order with high quality sites. It Also Reported That social networking sites are dropped down in ranking to two more advertisement. The Panda update has-been really a sequence of twists and renews added on with the method. While it has many vacant junk mail sites from the search engine positions, the disadvantage is many websites and genuine dealings Were Resettlement away with them.

Fortunately, Googlehas Affirmed precisely What They are looking so sites can consequently prepared and restore. This is absolutely Believed in the prospect of SEO and When Particularly preferred places to associate advertising. The updates or targeted sites are badly written and with the outdated copy. This eans Their sites are overused Usually to writing articles for quick and filled with keywords originate Themselves by the under side of the search pile. If the search engine styles are under Explained persist it can really concern us for the small dealer along with That is dipping into the shark hunt. Keep close eye on your Google webmaster tool.

There are several ways of building back links out of which link exchange is common among webmasters and seo expert. There are basically two types of link exchange i.e. two way link exchange and three way link exchange. I know you all guys are very well aware of one way and two way link exchange.

Before you start thinking to start link exchange for your or client website it is necessary to aware about disadvantages of link exchange.
Here are few top demerit / disadvantages of link exchange:

1) It's time consuming work
2) Your link can be removed any time without giving any notification and you will never know until you are going to cross check.
3) Even though you found that your link is no more available on other website, you will again have to contact to the webmaster to put it back which is really time consuming and double work.
4) If other webmaster not reply to your mail then ultimately you will have to option other than to remove their back link from your website, which is again going to consume your time, after all time is money.
5) Many times few bad webmasters block search engines to crawl those pages from where you are about to get back links. They do it through Robots.txt file or just keep rel = "nofollow" on your page link.

So think twice before you are going to put your hard work and time before you start link exchange. However doing link exchange through your friend's or relative's website is fine, at least you are sure that your link is going to live there as far the website is live.
Google Trying to penalizes Paid links:

Google is now Actively Encouraging webmasters to report 'Paid Links' so it can test a new hand of STI algorithm to Give less weight to links Paid thesis. This Can Be Done from the Google webmaster's console via a spam report form.
So what are Paid Links?

Rather Or What Does Google think of a bad link Paid? The answer According To Google is: Bad links are "paid links and PageRank flow That Attempt to game Google's rankings."

Often This is Obvious, When some ads for products or services Appears in small text boxes around the page and Have little relevance to the main page content.

Purpose what about 'sponsored listings' or 'sponsored ads' or 'banner advertising'. This is Where the distinction Becomes harder, Both for real people to tell, aussi order for robots to tell.

Some think eXtraSearch That 'Legitimate' forms of web advertising - Such as banner ads with links Could Be adversely hit in the near future by revised search engine algorithms to deal with Which Attempt Paid link the problem.

When considering a search engine marketing strategy, Business Referrals Likely to Anticipate Changes in search engines to keep ahead of Competitors. eXtraSearch Provide a consultancy service to Search engine business as well as full Providing search engine optimization services.

Google Chrome also penalised for Sponsor links if you search the word browser, Chrome No Longer appears on page 1 and Is Now 61 position. they has Google Said That Will penalizes this page by Reducing it's PageRank Which Will Reduce Ability to rank for terms Such as browser. Also added Google That this punishment Will last for at least 60 days.

Sunday, January 1, 2012

Google Panda upadate: Get Away from Low Quality Link Building!


Fast forward eight months and Google has made two major changes to its algorithm -- first to target spammy/scraper sites, followed by the larger Panda update that targeted "low quality" sites. Plus, Google penalized JCPenney, Forbes, and Overstock.com for "shady" linking practices.

What's it all mean for link builders? Well, it's time we say goodbye to low quality link building altogether.
'But The Competitors Are Doing It' Isn't an Excuse

This may be tough for some link builders to digest, especially if you're coming from a research standpoint and you see that competitors for a particular keyword are dominating because of their thousands upon thousands of pure spam links.

But here are two things you must consider about finding low quality, high volume links in your analysis:

1. Maybe it isn't the links that got the competitor where they are today. Maybe they are a big enough brand with a good enough reputation to be where they are for that particular keyword.
2. If the above doesn't apply, then maybe it's just a matter of time before Google cracks down even further, giving no weight to those spammy backlinks.

Because, let's face it. You don't want to be the SEO company behind the next Overstock or JCPenney link building gone wrong story!
How to Determine a Valuable Backlink Opportunity

How can you determine whether a site you're trying to gain a link from is valuable? Here are some "warning" signs as to what Google may have or eventually deem as a low-quality site.

* Lots of ads. If the site is covered with five blocks of AdSense, Kontera text links, or other advertising chunks, you might want to steer away from them.
* Lack of quality content. If you can get your article approved immediately, chances are this isn't the right article network for your needs. If the article network is approving spun or poorly written content, it will be hard for the algorithm to see your "diamond in the rough." Of course, when a site like Suite101.com, which has one hell of an editorial process, gets dinged, then extreme moderation may not necessarily be a sign of a safe site either (in their case, ads were the more likely issue).
* Lots of content, low traffic. A blog with a Google PageRank of 6 probably looks like a great place to spam a comment. But if that blog doesn't have good authority in terms of traffic and social sharing, then it may be put on the list of sites to be de-valued in the future. PageRank didn't save some of the sites in the Panda update, considering there are several sites with PageRank 7 and above (including a PR 9).
* Lack of moderation. Kind of goes with the above, except in this case I mean blog comments and directories. If you see a ton of spammy links on a page, you don't want yours to go next to it. Unless you consider it a spammy link, and then more power to you to join the rest of them.

What Should You Be Doing

Where should you focus your energy? Content, of course!

Nine in 10 organizations use blogs, whitepapers, webinars, infographics, and other high quality content to leverage for link building and to attract natural, organic links. Not only can use your content to build links, but you can use it to build leads as well by proving the business knows their stuff when it comes to their industry.
Have You Changed Your Link Building Strategy?

Conclusion: To Give a Bright Future to your Website According to SEO Aspects follow Quality Link Building. How to Define Quality Link Building is depends upon Submission rate and Submission type. like if you are doing Directory Submission you should know the Page Rank of the Submission site and How much it is relevant to your industry type that you are going to promote. Better to Avoid Bulk Directory Submission. Search Engine Submission Is the important Aspect in SEO. Article Submission with Good and Effective Quality Content is Suggested. Similar Industrious(Content) Promotional Site with Good Reputation. Quality Content Web2.0 pages creation and Social Networking and Quality One Way Linking Submission. limited submission of Quality Blog commenting and Social Book Marking are Suggested. Forum Posting with Quality Content and New Trendy Ideas and Suggestions are major updates. Building Quality Back links in a less proportion also yield god Results.

Contributor: Kristi Heins

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Nokia, MicroSoft Tied to Focus on Negative Reviews!


Microsoft and Nokia have been linked to the posting of astroturfing comments on a negative Nokia Lumia review.

The review of the Nokia Lumia 800, posted on the Indian Web site Moneylife.in, was based on the technical specifications rather than hands-on experience with the Windows Phone device. The review concluded that "Although Nokia sees its Lumia 800 to be a competitor to Apple iPhone [sic], it is nowhere near the niche product. In fact compared with iPhone, the Lumia 800 can be termed as 'noPhone'."

Many commenters were unhappy with the review. However, the tenor of the comments attracted the attention of Yogesh Sapkale, the review's author, who described what he saw as "orchestrated pile of comments."

The first comment came from someone named "Harish":

"What an crap review!! it's one of the best phone available, iphone is so dumb compared to this.... Guess some one is paying you lumpsum, congrats.."

Sapkale said the IP address associated with the comment was 192.100.117.41, which is assigned to Nokia.

Another comment, from someone named Aditya Agrawa, addresses a question of RAM:

"dude, gone are the times when actual consumers just use to care about the technical specificiations of mobiles. today, people want devices which are beauitful, fast and easy-to-use. for most of the consumers, it does not matter if the phone has 512mb or 1gb ram. if the 512mb performs better in real-life, that't the one customers are gonna prefer. just a small advice , go to a store and use windows phone 7.5 for 10 mins, the last thing you will care is whether the phone has a single or a dual core."

Sapkale said Agrawa's comment originated from 207.46.55.31, an IP address assigned to Microsoft.

Nokia and Microsoft representatives did not respond to requests for comment.

Taken altogether, the whole episode is a disaster. Two companies are accused--by the author of a product review who never touched the device--of efforts to boost the profile of their product without acknowledging their association to it.

But more troubling is the fact that the author of the review thought so little of his readers' privacy that he looked up and published their e-mail and IP addresses to satisfy his own curiosity and need for vindication.

Who Were more wrong?

Contribution: Steven Musil

Apple wins, HTC losts Finally the Lawsuit Issue on Looming Import Ban!


In a high-profile but strikingly limited legal victory for Apple, the U.S. International Trade Commission ruled today that HTC has violated only one of the Cupertino, Calif.-based company's patents.

The ITC--a quasi-judicial body that opponents of a Hollywood-backed copyright bill have proposed as a home for a new piracy court--said it would impose an import ban on some of HTC's products. But that won't take effect until April 19, 2012, giving HTC, Google, and other partners time to remove certain features or figure out technical work-arounds that don't infringe on the patent.

Taiwan-based HTC said today it will remove that feature from "all of our phones" soon, meaning the ITC's ruling (PDF) will have little practical effect.


Apple claims HTC's phones illegally use patented features found in the iPhone. The ruling is hardly a complete victory for Apple: in March 2010, the company filed a complaint saying HTC violated 10 of its patents. In a preliminary ruling in June, an ITC administrative law judge found only two violations, and today's ruling narrows the violation to only one of the original 10 patents.

Pierre Ferragu, a senior analyst at the London-based Sanford C. Bernstein research firm, said "this ruling will represent absolutely no disruption at all to HTC's business in the U.S."

In a statement to CNET, HTC general counsel Grace Lei said: "We are gratified that the commission affirmed the judge's initial determination on the '721 and '983 patents, and reversed its decision on the '263 patent and partially on the '647 patent. We are very pleased with the determination and we respect it. However, the '647 patent is a small UI experience and HTC will completely remove it from all of our phones soon."

Another option for HTC would be to create a technical work-around that doesn't run afoul of the patent in question, which deals with "data tapping" techniques that automatically format documents to allow, for instance, a dialer program to pop up when a phone number appears.

In a post on the FOSS Patents blog, Florian Mueller, who is critical of software patents, notes:

The import ban won't relate to HTC Android products that don't implement that feature, or that implement it in ways not covered by those patent claims. If Google can implement this popular feature, which users of modern-day smartphones really expect, without infringing on the two patent claims found infringed, this import ban won't have any effect whatsoever.

The patent in question, 5,946,647 was granted in 1999 and covers identifying data "having recognizable structures," such as a "phone number, post-office address, e-mail address, and name." Then, the patent says, a "parsing process" will allow "appropriate actions" to be taken.

The latest development is nevertheless a blow to HTC, which has made strides in building market share and a brand with its line of Android-powered smartphones, many of which feature the company's own Sense user interface. HTC was the first Android supporter that Apple chose to target, signaling the growing threat of Google's software to iOS and the iPhone franchise.

Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In a statement made when the complaint was originally filed, then-Apple CEO Steve Jobs, who died this fall, said: "We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours."

Technology companies in recent years have increasingly used the ITC to settle their disputes because the process is seen as more efficient than the federal courts. In addition, the threat of an embargo on products typically forces companies to settle more quickly.

HTC is considered the most vulnerable legally of the Android partners because it lacks a robust portfolio of patents that act as a potential shield. HTC this year purchased S3 Graphics, largely because of a collection of patents that could be used against Apple.

In September, HTC launched its legal counterattack against Apple in Delaware federal district court, using nine patents that originally came from Palm, Motorola, and Openwave Systems. Google transferred the rights to HTC on September 1. (A separate, earlier effort before the ITC was unsuccessful, according to an initial ruling in October.)

HTC created the first Android smartphone, the G1, and has seen its profile rise over the past few years. The company was also the first target of an Apple lawsuit related to Android, and is among the most deeply entrenched in litigation over the topic.

Mozilla Firefox9 Faster All New Browser Version For PCs and Tab's


Mozilla is laying claim to big performance improvements for Firefox 9, while Firefox for Android goes in for a shave and a haircut as it gets an entirely different look. Both desktop and Android updates are being released today.

Firefox 9 (download for Windows | Mac | Linux | Android) continues the browser's rapid-release development oscillation, where feature enhancements and performance improvements take the lead in alternating months.

The JavaScript improvement called Type Inference, which Mozilla spent more than a year developing, debuts on the PC version of Firefox. The short version is that sites that heavily rely on JavaScript--like Web apps or sites that render games, video, and 3D graphics--will render much, much faster.

What actually changed is this: A feature in Firefox's SpiderMonkey JavaScript engine, Type Inference creates type information by both monitoring the types of values as the program runs and analyzing the program's code. The type information then gets used during "just-in-time" compilation to generate more efficient code, and Mozilla says that major benchmarks like its own Kraken test and Google's V8 show the browser running around 30 percent faster.

On Macs, OS X Lion users will finally see support for two-finger swipe gestures, which sounds more offensive than it is. This simply means that if you've got the latest Mac OS, it'll be easier for you to jump from site to site. The Mac interface has also been tweaked to match the slight visual changes that arrived in Lion, and multiple monitor support in the browser has been improved.

Firefox 9 Android debuts a new way to interact with tabs, and ports the browser's signature bigger Back button to the mobile operating system. These screenshots are from the Aurora release of Firefox 9, so there might be slight changes in the stable version.

Web developers get some attention in Firefox 9, too. The most important developer changes in Firefox 9 are that sites that run Ajax or download large data sets will load faster, and sites can now display content as it's being downloaded thanks to new support to chunking XHR requests. While a technical term, the upshot of chunking XHR requests is that developers can build Web sites to receive large amounts of data faster, and thus making the site itself faster to load. JavaScript can also be used to detect a browser's Do Not Track preference, the option that tells Web sites not to use cookies to track a person's browsing behavior. A longer list of Web developer changes in Firefox 9 is available.

Firefox's new Android tablet interface makes it to the stable version of the browser, and the interface changes are drastic. As I noted when the new look arrived in the Aurora channel in September, the Back button has moved to the location bar, which has been stretched to the right edge of the screen to put Refresh and Bookmark buttons closer at hand. Tabs have been moved to a hidden menu when in portrait mode, and appear much larger than they have before when they're exposed. There have been some performance gains, too, as Mozilla says that people ought to see faster app load times.

This new look won't be around long, though. Mozilla plans to rebuild its app using native Android code, and the mock-ups show even more changes to the interface. One change that does look like it'll stick around is a new sidebar approach to the Awesome Bar, so that when you tap the location bar, tabs for Bookmarks, Open tabs, History, and Sync appear on the side while you scroll in the middle of the window.

There have also been two big improvements to HTML5 support in Firefox for Android. The browser now supports the Input Tag for cameras, which means that developers can build mobile sites and apps that will take pictures and scan bar codes without leaving Firefox. Mozilla created a demo of the Input Tag here.

The second change supports the HTML5 Form Validation API, for automatic form-field validation. Basically, it will be easier to get the browser to validate typed text.

While the future of Firefox for Android lies in abandoning the current interface for the predicted massive speed gains from native Android code, the PC version of Firefox looks to address ongoing add-on compatibility issues, and give the browser a more seamless automatic update experience.

Contribution: Seth Rosenbalt

Friday, December 16, 2011

Long-Tail Keywords Increase Search Rankings By SEO On Page Optimization


On-page optimization for long-tail keywords can result in ranking more than a page higher in search results, compared to half a page optimizing with head terms, according to a study by New York-based SEO & SaaS company Conductor. They also found that long-tail keywords converted 2.5 times better than head terms.

You may remember the uproar from last fall, when SEOMoz purported there was a higher correlation between LDA scores and high rankings than any other factor. Some took this to mean that on-page optimization didn’t matter. It’s a topic that still pops up now and again; my on-page optimization isn’t working, I don’t know if it’s worth it... on-page optimization must be dead.

Not so, says Conductor. In their research study The Long Tail of Search, Conductor examined the effects of on-page auditing and optimization for long-tail keywords, versus optimizing for head terms or failing to optimize on-page at all. Not surprisingly, they saw a downward movement of more than two positions for keywords with no on-page optimization.

“Even in 2011 – often at executive prodding – many marketers are still singularly focused on the most searched terms in their industry that are also the most competitive and difficult to move up the search rankings," Conductor CEO Seth Besmertnik told Search Engine Watch. "As our study shows, we think there is huge opportunity in the long tail of search for the savvy search marketer to move up the search rankings more rapidly and convert at a rate that is 2.5 times greater than for head terms.”

Conductor’s research involved thousands of keywords studied over a period of nine months, using the data collection and on-page recommendations of their SEO platform, Searchlight. They first segmented keywords into three groups:

1. Keywords with shrinking on-page issues (being resolved by SEO).
2. Keywords with growing on-page issues (not being resolved by SEO).
3. Keywords with no on-page issues.


On-Page Optimization Crucial for SEO:

Optimizing on-page elements for the keywords marketers want to rank for is critical, according to Conductor's research. On-page optimization for keywords identified by Searchlight as having on-page issues consistently resulted in rankings increases, by an average of 11.24 positions.

Websites with identified issues but no on-page optimization saw a two position drop. Keywords with no identified issues saw a less than one position increase.
Long-Tail Keywords Show Greatest Rankings Increases. Recognizing that there are two ways marketers commonly use the word “long-tail,” they looked at query volumes and the number of keywords in a phrase as separate issues and tested twice.

First, they excluded medium-volume keywords for the purpose of this study, focusing on those with either high (head) or low (long-tail) query volumes. In this breakdown, they found that long-tail terms were “significantly” more impacted by on-page optimization, with an 11 position increase, compared to six positions for higher volume, head keywords. For the second part, they separated keywords according to the number of words in the term; head keywords were one to two word queries, while long-tail terms had three or more words. Again, they found that on-page optimization increased long-term rankings more, but by a smaller margin. With this segmentation, long-tail terms rose an average of six positions and head terms an average of four.
Long-Tail Terms Convert 2.5 Times More

The final part of their study looked at conversion rates, examining more than 7 million visits to three major retailers. Long-tail terms – those with three words or more – converted two and a half times more than head terms. Conductor said this is a great opportunity for marketers who may be disproportionately focusing on higher volume, one- to two-word search terms. On-page optimization is one of many strategies SEOs and marketers can use to increase rankings and conversions. It’s also just good practice to make sure your page addresses the issues that brought visitors to the site in the first place.

Contribution: Miranda Miller

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Google Panda Updates for SEO Review 2011


Although the online Search Engine Giant on the internet look for big makes a amazing 500 changes to the inner details of their software every period, there is certainly not an SEO company on the earth that has not been hit by Google’s latest Algorithm Updates on the internet bet on key elements changes. It is these complicated specifications of complete that management who comes out on top when it comes to SEO work, Many of the changes will takes place in the scores and Income Top status and Chartered Online Search Engine sites comes immediately and some of the new internet sites are head on SERP's.

Initially the Panda update was called the farmer update by the search engine marketing industry because it seemed to be targeting content farms and low quality sites that were spamming the search results. It was originally launched in February 2011 and was credited with affecting up to 12% of all search results pages. The purpose behind Google Panda was to identify low quality content vs. high quality content and was named after one of Google’s lead engineers.

The impact of the latest change (named ‘Panda 2.5’ by industry leaders) has had on the SEO industry that SEO (search engine optimization) has been one of the most important buzz words for web publishers over the past 10 years. Getting ranked in Google means free traffic for web publishers, so improving and optimizing a given website for the search engines was essential. However, Google Panda is here to stay, and it has forever changed the rules of SEO.

Panda has exposed the shady SEO tactics of less-than-reputable SEO firms and favoured websites that offer unique content and trustworthy backlinks. Sites that have been identified as spam sites or content farms have been worst hit, while some of the world’s most prestigious PR websites have suffered a huge blow for reasons largely unknown. Though the many different components of SEO can be difficult for business owners to get their heads around, these Panda updates have proven one thing for sure – anyone looking to partner with an online marketing agency needs to choose a company that has their best interests at heart, not just the interests of their bank account. Failure to do so could end up damaging the reputation of the company's website".

Google bosses improve their search facilities by the day. In an interview conducted by stonetemple.com with Google's Director of Research Peter Norvig, the expert claims that 'Google tests tens of thousands of algorithm changes per year, and make one to two actual changes every day'.

As more and more users complained about search results, Google realized it needed to shift, and in came Google Panda. Google Panda is an entirely new way for Google to evaluate websites. And while Google will still factor in many of the same criteria it has in the past, Google Panda adds an entirely new element to Google's ranking methodology.

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Best Web Hosting